Ki Tetze, Birds and the Breath of Goodness
According to Moses Maimonides this week’s portion contains
72 mitzvot, far more than any other Torah portion. Within this plethora of commandments we
discover: “If, along the road, you chance upon a bird’s nest, in any tree or on
the ground, with fledglings or eggs and the mother sitting over the fledglings
or on the eggs, do not take the mother together with her young. Let the mother go, and take only the young,
in order that you may fare well and have a long life.” (Deuteronomy 22:6-7)
This is an interesting command. It is important to note that the Torah does
not just deal with ritual life but with ethical obligations. Moreover the Torah’s concern extends not just
to human beings but to all of God’s creatures.
Still, one wonders how this act is a measure of compassion. The tradition reasons that the mother must be
sent away so that she does not see her young taken. Human beings are allowed to make use of God’s
creation, and even creatures, but with this permission comes certain
responsibilities. We must not cause undo
suffering to animals. The Torah
therefore takes the mother’s pain into account.
This is why this mitzvah is connected to long life. This reward mirrors that promise offered for
the commandment to honor parents. The
vast majority of mitzvot do not have such a reward attached to them. These are two of the few instances. Of course this raises the question. If I do not show honor to my parents, if I
fail to let the mother bird go, will I not be rewarded with long life?
The Talmud offers a story.
Elisha ben Abuyah, a colleague of Rabbi Akiva, once saw a young boy
climb a tree to fetch eggs from a nest. In
observance of the command, he shooed the mother bird away before taking the
eggs. When climbing down from the tree
he fell and died. Elisha saw this and
rejected his Jewish faith. How could
there be a good and just God, he reasoned, and apparently said very loudly.
Such is the question that has occupied Jewish thinkers for
generations. While Elisha’s is among the
most radical that our tradition preserves (he is deemed a heretic by his
colleagues but not written out of their book), I prefer the reasoning of Moses
Maimonides, the great medieval philosopher.
He writes in his Guide
of the Perplexed: “Consider the
environment in which we have our being: the more urgently a thing is needed by
living beings, the more abundantly (and cheaply) it is found. The less dependent on anything, the rarer
(and more expensive) it is. Thus the
things man needs most, for instance are air, water, and food… This is a mark of God’s goodness and bounty.”
(Guide, III:12)
When we look at the world we tend to forget that even the
air we breathe is a gift from God. We
make long lists of all the things we need (among them, a long, healthy life)
and when we don’t receive but one of these we ask, where is God? Maimonides counsels us that we need to look
at the world differently, we need to look at God differently. Look at how plentiful the air we breathe
is. Look at how quenching is the water I
drink.
I admit his advice is sometimes difficult, and challenging,
to follow. Most people don’t know that
Maimonides faced a similar struggle.
Fourteen years prior to penning these words, his brother drowned in a
ship wreck in the Indian Ocean. In
addition to losing his only brother much of the family fortune was lost. Maimonides was forced to devote more time to
his medical profession in order to support his family, as well as his brother’s.
For a full year following his brother’s death the person who
most believe was the greatest Jewish thinker who ever lived spent a year in
bed, depressed beyond all consolation.
He wrote to a friend: “Now my joy has been changed into darkness; [my
brother] has gone to his eternal home, and has left me prostrated in a strange
land. Whenever I come across his
handwriting in one of his books, my heart grows faint within me, and my grief
reawakens.”
With the litany of our tradition’s blessings it is curious
that the no blessing is mandated for water and air, and yet they are as much a
sign of God’s bounty as the hallah we will taste, and bless, tomorrow evening.
Take counsel from Maimonides’ words. Take heart from his life.
Sometimes it really does take years to see again the beauty and wonder in God’s world.
Sometimes it really does take years to see again the beauty and wonder in God’s world.
Elul and Good People
Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel wrote: “The good person is not
he who does the right thing, but he who is in the habit of doing the right
thing.”
It is simple, and perhaps easy, to do a single good deed, to
volunteer at a soup kitchen on a Sunday, to write a check to a needy charity,
to offer one apology to a person wronged, or to attend Rosh Hashanah and Yom
Kippur services. These are all worthy
endeavors but Judaism is not about the solitary act but instead about a litany
of acts, a lifetime of doing right. Our
faith is about creating a discipline of doing, about ritualizing behaviors.
This is why Judaism sets aside not two days for the task of
repentance, or even ten, but instead forty.
On Tuesday, with the new moon of Elul, this forty day period of
introspection and repair began. It began
with Rosh Hodesh Elul, gains momentum with the meditative Selichot service (on
Saturday, September 20th at 7 pm), further intensifies with the
prayers of Rosh Hashanah and reaches a crescendo with the fasting of Yom
Kippur. These forty days mirror the days
Moses spent on Mount Sinai communing with God.
They are intended so that we might turn inward and examine our ways and
repair our wrongs.
Repentance, teshuvah, is about turning and changing. This of course is no simple task. It is not about reciting one Al Cheyt, one
moment of apology, one solitary word of forgiveness, but instead about building
a life centered on words and deeds. It
is about stringing together a few acts until they become a habit. That cannot
be accomplished in a mere two days, no matter how meaningful our services are, no
matter how heartfelt our praying and singing might be.
Each of these days we are granted an opportunity for renewal
and repair. Set aside moments during the
course of this month and ask yourself what you would like to change, from whom
you would like to offer an apology and seek forgiveness.
We are given a blessing each and every one of these days to create new habits. And from there we begin to build the title of good person.
We are given a blessing each and every one of these days to create new habits. And from there we begin to build the title of good person.
Reeh, Friends and Enemies
In the traditional haggadah we read the following prayer when opening the door for Elijah: “Pour out your fury on the nations that do not know you, upon the kingdoms that do not invoke your name, for they have devoured Jacob and desolated his home. Pour out your wrath on them; may your blazing anger overtake them. Pursue them in wrath and destroy them from under the heavens of Adonai!”
Added to the haggadah during the murderous Crusades, these words seem out of step with our modern, universal values. Even though we are sympathetic to the origins of this prayer, our liberal haggadahs have deleted it from our Seders. We speak instead about the messianic peace that Elijah will announce rather than the vengeance he might exact.
This week’s portion echoes these sentiments and begins with a similar refrain. Here it is not a prayer but a command. “You must destroy all the sites at which the nations you are to dispossess worshipped their gods, whether on lofty mountains or on hills under any luxuriant tree. Tear down their altars, smash their pillars, put their sacred posts to the fire, and cut down the images of their gods, obliterating their name from that site.” (Deuteronomy 12:2-3)
Again this appears contrary to everything we believe. Destroying non-believers and their places of worship contradicts everything we hold dear. How is this any different from the hate filled words of the Hamas’ charter or the savagery of ISIS? How are our Torah’s words different from those who read their tradition’s words as a mandate to murder and destroy?
And yet we live in a time when suggesting we have no enemies is equally problematic. Thus we are trapped between those who are unable to name our real enemies and those who see enemies everywhere and anywhere. A.B. Yehoshua, a leading Israeli novelist, recently argued that this is in fact the crucial dilemma facing Israel. The failure to call Hamas an enemy rather than a terrorist state prevents Israel from confronting Hamas and its rockets and tunnels. The fight against terror is never ending. Confronting an enemy by contrast offers two clear options: negotiations or war.
Yehoshua writes: “Let us not forget: The Palestinians in Gaza are our permanent neighbors, and we are theirs. We will never halt the bloody destruction by talking of ‘terror.’ It will require negotiation, or a war against a legitimate ‘enemy.’" (“Israel Needs to Stop Calling Hamas a Terrorist Organization,” The New Republic, August 13, 2014)
Terrorism is a tactic. And the so-called war on terror is an unhelpful euphemism that avoids the challenge of naming our enemies. Only by naming our enemies can we truly confront today’s struggles.
Our times need not be so confusing. Those who wish to destroy us and proclaim it in such unmistakable terms, those who revile the pluralism for which this country stands, are most certainly our enemies. We must not be afraid to say such words. Our world has real enemies. Does that make such prayers legitimate? Does that make such commands meaningful? I recoil from these words. Better perhaps that we should pray for peace rather than seeking vengeance. Still we must remain forever on guard and vigilant.
We must also work to be sure that those with whom we have honest disagreements remain friends. We dare not confuse friend with enemy. Articulating a vision of pluralism and an acceptance of different worldviews is paramount. Let us be clear. When others advocate for our destruction they name themselves as our enemies. We must remain unafraid of saying so in clear and unmistakable terms. We must avoid euphemisms that confuse the moral challenge.
We pray: “May God, who blessed our forefathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, bless the soldiers of the Israel Defense Forces, who stand guard over our land and the cities of our God, from the border of Lebanon to the desert of Egypt, and from the Great Sea to the Aravah, on land, in the air, and on the sea. May the Lord cause the enemies who rise up against us to be struck down before them. May the Holy Blessed One preserve and rescue our soldiers from every trouble and distress and from every plague and illness, and may God send blessing and success in their every endeavor….” (Prayer for the Welfare of Israel Defense Forces Soldiers)
Pray for peace. Remain vigilant. Fight against our enemies when they rise up against us.
Remain clear-sighted. Know who is an enemy. Remember who is a friend.
Added to the haggadah during the murderous Crusades, these words seem out of step with our modern, universal values. Even though we are sympathetic to the origins of this prayer, our liberal haggadahs have deleted it from our Seders. We speak instead about the messianic peace that Elijah will announce rather than the vengeance he might exact.
This week’s portion echoes these sentiments and begins with a similar refrain. Here it is not a prayer but a command. “You must destroy all the sites at which the nations you are to dispossess worshipped their gods, whether on lofty mountains or on hills under any luxuriant tree. Tear down their altars, smash their pillars, put their sacred posts to the fire, and cut down the images of their gods, obliterating their name from that site.” (Deuteronomy 12:2-3)
Again this appears contrary to everything we believe. Destroying non-believers and their places of worship contradicts everything we hold dear. How is this any different from the hate filled words of the Hamas’ charter or the savagery of ISIS? How are our Torah’s words different from those who read their tradition’s words as a mandate to murder and destroy?
And yet we live in a time when suggesting we have no enemies is equally problematic. Thus we are trapped between those who are unable to name our real enemies and those who see enemies everywhere and anywhere. A.B. Yehoshua, a leading Israeli novelist, recently argued that this is in fact the crucial dilemma facing Israel. The failure to call Hamas an enemy rather than a terrorist state prevents Israel from confronting Hamas and its rockets and tunnels. The fight against terror is never ending. Confronting an enemy by contrast offers two clear options: negotiations or war.
Yehoshua writes: “Let us not forget: The Palestinians in Gaza are our permanent neighbors, and we are theirs. We will never halt the bloody destruction by talking of ‘terror.’ It will require negotiation, or a war against a legitimate ‘enemy.’" (“Israel Needs to Stop Calling Hamas a Terrorist Organization,” The New Republic, August 13, 2014)
Terrorism is a tactic. And the so-called war on terror is an unhelpful euphemism that avoids the challenge of naming our enemies. Only by naming our enemies can we truly confront today’s struggles.
Our times need not be so confusing. Those who wish to destroy us and proclaim it in such unmistakable terms, those who revile the pluralism for which this country stands, are most certainly our enemies. We must not be afraid to say such words. Our world has real enemies. Does that make such prayers legitimate? Does that make such commands meaningful? I recoil from these words. Better perhaps that we should pray for peace rather than seeking vengeance. Still we must remain forever on guard and vigilant.
We must also work to be sure that those with whom we have honest disagreements remain friends. We dare not confuse friend with enemy. Articulating a vision of pluralism and an acceptance of different worldviews is paramount. Let us be clear. When others advocate for our destruction they name themselves as our enemies. We must remain unafraid of saying so in clear and unmistakable terms. We must avoid euphemisms that confuse the moral challenge.
We pray: “May God, who blessed our forefathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, bless the soldiers of the Israel Defense Forces, who stand guard over our land and the cities of our God, from the border of Lebanon to the desert of Egypt, and from the Great Sea to the Aravah, on land, in the air, and on the sea. May the Lord cause the enemies who rise up against us to be struck down before them. May the Holy Blessed One preserve and rescue our soldiers from every trouble and distress and from every plague and illness, and may God send blessing and success in their every endeavor….” (Prayer for the Welfare of Israel Defense Forces Soldiers)
Pray for peace. Remain vigilant. Fight against our enemies when they rise up against us.
Remain clear-sighted. Know who is an enemy. Remember who is a friend.
Ekev, Bread and Faith
This week we read the famous line: “…man does not live on
bread alone.” But what exactly does this
oft-quoted phrase mean?
First
let’s examine the context:
God
has made you travel in the wilderness these past forty years, that He might test
you by hardships to learn what was in your hearts: whether you would keep His
commandments or not. He subjected you to
the hardship of hunger and then gave you manna to eat, which neither you nor
your fathers had ever known, in order to teach you that man does not live on
bread alone, but that man may live on anything that the Lord decrees. The
clothes upon you did not wear out, nor did your feet swell these forty years. Bear
in mind that the Lord your God disciplines you just as a man disciplines his
son. Therefore keep the commandments of the Lord your God: walk in His ways and
revere Him. (Deuteronomy 8:2-6)
Looking at the larger context we learn that
this is a lesson about tough love. God
subjects the Jewish people to hardships throughout their wanderings in order to
test their devotion. God further tests
the people so that they might learn that there is only one true source of
sustenance and that is God. Well, sign
me up!
How is this motivating? How is this a compelling argument for faith? Who wants to be hungry? Who wants to be disciplined?
Perhaps the larger lesson is different. While we may not wish to look toward God as
the source of hardships, discipline and tests, they are a part of life. The notion that life will never offer us
challenges, that the road will always be even, is of course mistaken. Everyone, even our children, will face
difficulties. All of us will encounter
hardships.
So we must see even these hardships as
opportunities. And how might we gain
this change of heart? By looking to God.
The idea is not that we should observe God’s
commandments so that we might never face difficulties. It is not as well that we have to prove our
faith to God, as the Torah appears to suggest, but instead that these
challenges can be openings to allow God in.
Bread might sustain our bodies, but life is
sustained by far more.
After every meal our tradition counsels us
that we are supposed to recite a blessing. This too is found in this week’s
portion. “When you have eaten and are
full, then you shall bless the Lord your God.” (Deuteronomy 8:10) The Hasidic rabbi, Shlomo of Karlin,
comments: “By blessing God you will become full.”
The fullness of our hearts can only come from singing
praises to God. Being satisfied comes
not from a belly filled with bread but instead from giving thanks.
A meal is much more than the food on our plates.
Only faith can fill the heart.
Only faith can fill the heart.
Vaetchanan and Pleading for Peace
For all his successes and triumphs, our hero Moses is denied setting foot on the Promised Land. Because he grew angry at the Israelites and hit a rock, God states that he will not be allowed to enter the land of Israel.
This week Moses begs God to change this decree: “I pleaded with the Lord… Let me, I pray, cross over and see the good land on the other side of the Jordan…” (Deuteronomy 4:23-25)
The commentators are bothered that Moses pleads. Begging appears beneath him. His words seem undignified for a leader. They wonder as well how Moses can question God’s judgment. The medieval writer, Moses ibn Ezra, suggests that even in this instance, Moses, who the tradition calls “Moshe Rabbeinu—Moses, our Teacher,” is offering a lesson. And what is it that he teaches the people? It is a lesson about the supreme value of living in the land of Israel. It is as if to say, “Living in the land is worth pleading.”
The modern commentator, Yeshayahu Leibowitz, reads this passage differently. He suggests that Moses is not asking for forgiveness, but instead arguing that he did not even commit a wrong. The decree is therefore unjustified and should rightfully be annulled. What chutzpah! In the end Moses’ request is partially fulfilled. God responds to his plea and allows him to see the land from afar. Moses is allowed to glimpse the beauty of Eretz Yisrael, the land of Israel.
I continue to wonder. For what is it appropriate to plead? For what can I beg God?
These weeks an answer begins to emerge. How about peace? Let my plea be heard! Let shalom be granted—even if but partially. Does such a plea appear undignified?
I continue to rely on the Israeli poet, Yehuda Amichai.
Not the peace of a cease-fire
not even the vision of the wolf and the lamb,
but rather
as in the heart when the excitement is over
and you can talk only about a great weariness.
I know that I know how to kill,
that makes me an adult.
And my son plays with a toy gun that knows
how to open and close its eyes and say Mama.
A peace
without the big noise of beating swords into ploughshares,
without words, without
the thud of the heavy rubber stamp: let it be
light, floating, like lazy white foam.
A little rest for the wounds –
who speaks of healing?
(And the howl of orphans is passed from generation
to the next, as in a relay race:
the baton never falls.)
Let it come
like wildflowers,
suddenly, because the field
must have it: wildpeace.
Please God. I plead. Vaetchnanan!
This week Moses begs God to change this decree: “I pleaded with the Lord… Let me, I pray, cross over and see the good land on the other side of the Jordan…” (Deuteronomy 4:23-25)
The commentators are bothered that Moses pleads. Begging appears beneath him. His words seem undignified for a leader. They wonder as well how Moses can question God’s judgment. The medieval writer, Moses ibn Ezra, suggests that even in this instance, Moses, who the tradition calls “Moshe Rabbeinu—Moses, our Teacher,” is offering a lesson. And what is it that he teaches the people? It is a lesson about the supreme value of living in the land of Israel. It is as if to say, “Living in the land is worth pleading.”
The modern commentator, Yeshayahu Leibowitz, reads this passage differently. He suggests that Moses is not asking for forgiveness, but instead arguing that he did not even commit a wrong. The decree is therefore unjustified and should rightfully be annulled. What chutzpah! In the end Moses’ request is partially fulfilled. God responds to his plea and allows him to see the land from afar. Moses is allowed to glimpse the beauty of Eretz Yisrael, the land of Israel.
I continue to wonder. For what is it appropriate to plead? For what can I beg God?
These weeks an answer begins to emerge. How about peace? Let my plea be heard! Let shalom be granted—even if but partially. Does such a plea appear undignified?
I continue to rely on the Israeli poet, Yehuda Amichai.
Not the peace of a cease-fire
not even the vision of the wolf and the lamb,
but rather
as in the heart when the excitement is over
and you can talk only about a great weariness.
I know that I know how to kill,
that makes me an adult.
And my son plays with a toy gun that knows
how to open and close its eyes and say Mama.
A peace
without the big noise of beating swords into ploughshares,
without words, without
the thud of the heavy rubber stamp: let it be
light, floating, like lazy white foam.
A little rest for the wounds –
who speaks of healing?
(And the howl of orphans is passed from generation
to the next, as in a relay race:
the baton never falls.)
Let it come
like wildflowers,
suddenly, because the field
must have it: wildpeace.
Please God. I plead. Vaetchnanan!
Tisha B'Av, Tragedy and Renewal
On Tuesday, the Jewish world will observe the saddest day in our calendar, Tisha B’Av.
This day commemorates the destruction of the first Temple by the Babylonians in 586 B.C.E. and the second by the Romans in 70 C.E. According to tradition it also marks the expulsion of the Jews from England in 1290 and from Spain in 1492. This day has therefore become the day on which we mark our many collective tragedies.
In 70 not only was the Temple destroyed but the city of Jerusalem also decimated. Most of its inhabitants were murdered or carted off to Rome as slaves. (For visitors to Italy one can see this depicted on the Arch of Titus.)
And yet out of this devastation grew rabbinic Judaism. The rabbis authored prayers whose words echoed longings for a different, and renewed, Jerusalem. “Blessed are You, Adonai, Guardian of Israel, whose shelter of peace is spread over us, over all Your people Israel, and over Jerusalem.” Even at weddings they counseled that we pause to remember this great tragedy and shatter a glass.
If not for this great calamity, the Judaism we know and love, the Jewish life of synagogue and home, would not exist.
Rabbi Yitz Greenberg writes:
Out of every tragedy comes the sparks of something new and different.
In 1492 Queen Isabella ordered that the Jews be banished from Spain. The edict was signed on March 31, 1492. The Jews, who had enjoyed there a golden age, were given only four months to leave the country. And thus four months later on the ninth of Av (Tisha B’Av) all the Jews left Spain.
And the next day, Columbus set sail.
We know the rest of that story.
This day commemorates the destruction of the first Temple by the Babylonians in 586 B.C.E. and the second by the Romans in 70 C.E. According to tradition it also marks the expulsion of the Jews from England in 1290 and from Spain in 1492. This day has therefore become the day on which we mark our many collective tragedies.
In 70 not only was the Temple destroyed but the city of Jerusalem also decimated. Most of its inhabitants were murdered or carted off to Rome as slaves. (For visitors to Italy one can see this depicted on the Arch of Titus.)
And yet out of this devastation grew rabbinic Judaism. The rabbis authored prayers whose words echoed longings for a different, and renewed, Jerusalem. “Blessed are You, Adonai, Guardian of Israel, whose shelter of peace is spread over us, over all Your people Israel, and over Jerusalem.” Even at weddings they counseled that we pause to remember this great tragedy and shatter a glass.
If not for this great calamity, the Judaism we know and love, the Jewish life of synagogue and home, would not exist.
Rabbi Yitz Greenberg writes:
The Rabbis’ fundamental theological breakthrough was a ‘secularization’ insight. God was becoming less visible, more hidden. The Destruction was a signal that manifest divine activity was being curtailed. God would not stop the Romans or save the Temple (even though God had destroyed the Egyptians at the Red Sea). Still the covenant was not being disowned; it was being renewed…. The original covenant remained, but humans became more active and responsible. (The Jewish Way)It is in our hands. The peace of Jerusalem is within our grasp. This is what we must continue to believe.
Out of every tragedy comes the sparks of something new and different.
In 1492 Queen Isabella ordered that the Jews be banished from Spain. The edict was signed on March 31, 1492. The Jews, who had enjoyed there a golden age, were given only four months to leave the country. And thus four months later on the ninth of Av (Tisha B’Av) all the Jews left Spain.
And the next day, Columbus set sail.
We know the rest of that story.
Writing Out, Drawing In
Below is my commentary published by Ten Minutes of Torah - Reform Voices of Torah - D'varim.
There is great power in language, in our words. It draws us in. Every time we recite the words, Adonai Eloheinu, "the Eternal our God," we write ourselves into the Jewish story. Yet, the very same language that writes us in, the very same stories that draw us in, also write others out. There can only be an "us" if there is also a "them." This is the implication of the portion's words, "The Eternal our God spoke to us at Horeb . . ."
There remain some for whom these words are foreign, who are cast aside by them. Hidden within this concept of us are the words "not them"—and the even more painful "not you."
It is these thoughts that continue to haunt me after officiating at a particularly tragic funeral. A young couple asked me to help them bury their child. Because one parent is Jewish and the other Christian, only half the mourners were Jewish. I wondered, was I helping the mourners with the words I recited, especially those said in Hebrew? Were the tradition's words that are our inheritance and bring our people so much comfort instead making half of those present feel excluded?
As we turned to the ritual of placing the shovels full of earth into the grave, I invited all to participate. Some quietly asked me if it would be OK for them to take part given that they are not Jewish. I answered with an emphatic, "Yes, of course." Everyone took turns: parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins; friends, rabbis, and pastors; Jews and Christians. No one stopped until the task was completed and the mitzvah fulfilled.
I smoothed over the earth that now reached the edges of the grass. I thanked all for participating. We were united by the work of our hands.
An ordinary shovel had become an instrument of holiness. A minyan of sorrow had been formed. Perhaps tragedy makes us one. Suffering and pain can draw us together. In that moment, standing at that grave, I discovered that there are moments when there is only us and no them. Such was the gift and teaching of a child now gone.
Words might exclude. Actions unite.
There is great power in language, in our words. It draws us in. Every time we recite the words, Adonai Eloheinu, "the Eternal our God," we write ourselves into the Jewish story. Yet, the very same language that writes us in, the very same stories that draw us in, also write others out. There can only be an "us" if there is also a "them." This is the implication of the portion's words, "The Eternal our God spoke to us at Horeb . . ."
There remain some for whom these words are foreign, who are cast aside by them. Hidden within this concept of us are the words "not them"—and the even more painful "not you."
It is these thoughts that continue to haunt me after officiating at a particularly tragic funeral. A young couple asked me to help them bury their child. Because one parent is Jewish and the other Christian, only half the mourners were Jewish. I wondered, was I helping the mourners with the words I recited, especially those said in Hebrew? Were the tradition's words that are our inheritance and bring our people so much comfort instead making half of those present feel excluded?
As we turned to the ritual of placing the shovels full of earth into the grave, I invited all to participate. Some quietly asked me if it would be OK for them to take part given that they are not Jewish. I answered with an emphatic, "Yes, of course." Everyone took turns: parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins; friends, rabbis, and pastors; Jews and Christians. No one stopped until the task was completed and the mitzvah fulfilled.
I smoothed over the earth that now reached the edges of the grass. I thanked all for participating. We were united by the work of our hands.
An ordinary shovel had become an instrument of holiness. A minyan of sorrow had been formed. Perhaps tragedy makes us one. Suffering and pain can draw us together. In that moment, standing at that grave, I discovered that there are moments when there is only us and no them. Such was the gift and teaching of a child now gone.
Words might exclude. Actions unite.
Masei, Jewish Power and Its Agitations
On Passover we sing Vehi Sheamda in a tune that belies its meaning: “This promise has stood us and our parents in good stead. For not only has one enemy stood over us to annihilate us. But in every generation enemies have stood over us to annihilate us. Yet the Holy One keeps the promise to save us from their hands.”
The world is once again convulsing with hatred of the Jews. Israel is fighting an enemy whose stated mission is to destroy us. Synagogues are desecrated in France. Throughout Europe people once again riot against the Jewish state. The distinction that some pretend exists is no more. There is no difference between anti-Israel sentiment and antisemitism. (Loving criticism of Israel does not of course make the critic anti-Israel.)
Amos Oz, a leading Israeli novelist, writes...
The world is once again convulsing with hatred of the Jews. Israel is fighting an enemy whose stated mission is to destroy us. Synagogues are desecrated in France. Throughout Europe people once again riot against the Jewish state. The distinction that some pretend exists is no more. There is no difference between anti-Israel sentiment and antisemitism. (Loving criticism of Israel does not of course make the critic anti-Israel.)
Amos Oz, a leading Israeli novelist, writes...
Mattot, Arguments and Destructions
We read this week: “Moses spoke to the heads of the
Israelite tribes, saying…” (Numbers 30:2)
It is rare that the Torah addresses the leaders and not the
people as a whole. In most instances the Torah states instead, “Moses
spoke to the people, saying…” (Numbers 31:1)
Why in this instance would Moses speak to the tribal heads rather than
the people?
Perhaps the secret can be discerned in the laws detailed in
this chapter. Here we read about the concept
of making vows. The Hatam Sofer, a
leading rabbi in 19th century Germany, asks the very same questions
and opines that this law is directed at leaders because people in public office
are more often tempted to make promises that they cannot keep. It is as if to say, “Be on guard of the words
and promises you make.”
I would like to suggest a different reason.
On Tuesday we marked the 17th of Tammuz, the fast
day commemorating the beginning of the destruction of Jerusalem. It is this day, nearly two thousand years
ago, that the Romans breached the walls surrounding the city. The city and the Temple were destroyed three
weeks later on Tisha B’Av (the ninth of Av).
This period of mourning marks the Jewish people’s greatest tragedy, until
the modern period and its Holocaust. The
loss of the Temple, the destruction of Jerusalem and the slaughter then of so many
Jews is still remembered even at Jewish weddings by the breaking of the glass.
It was of course the Romans, and prior to that the
Babylonians, who destroyed the first and second Temples, but yet the rabbis
engaged in what was sometimes wrenching introspection in order to uncover how
the Jewish people might have been at fault for their own destruction. They more often than not suggested that it
was because of baseless hatred of one Jew for another. The seeds of our demise were sown by how we screamed
and yelled at each other.
The rabbis of course believed in argument and especially
passionate debate. They taught that
truth can only emerge when we openly argue and debate with one another. We read: “Any debate that is for the sake of
heaven, its end will continue; but that which is not for the sake of heaven, its end will
not continue. What is a debate for the sake
of heaven? The debate between Rabbis
Hillel and Shammai. And a debate that is
not for the sake of heaven? The debate
of Korah and his entire band of rebels.” (Avot 5:17)
There is a fine line between a positive and negative
argument. It rests in how we approach
those with whom we disagree. The rabbis
offer us an important insight. While we
might be strengthened by debate, we are weakened by tribal divisions. When we debate we must ask, are we arguing so
that truth might emerge? Or are we
arguing instead to draw divisions between us?
This is why Moses speaks to the tribal heads. Our very survival depends on how our leaders
argue and debate. It rests in how leaders
speak to one another.
Pinhas, Sirens and Children at Play
On Tuesday evening at approximately 10 pm, as I walked home from the Shalom Hartman Institute where I am spending two weeks studying and learning, the sirens sounded throughout Jerusalem. I was midway between the Institute and the apartment I rent in Jerusalem’s German Colony. I had never heard these warning sirens before except to indicate the minute of silences observed on Yom HaShoah and Yom HaZikaron. I heard two booms. I quickened my pace, but still paused to look both ways before crossing the busy thoroughfare of Emek Refaim, finally making it back to my apartment in a few minutes. Then I thought that perhaps I should go downstairs to the miklat, bomb shelter. I joined others in the basement outside of the locked shelter. After waiting there the required ten minutes we said our good evenings and returned to our apartments.
I have since learned that I handled my first missile attack incorrectly. It takes a Hamas rocket approximately 90 seconds to reach the Jerusalem area and so as confident I might have been about my quickened pace I was actually supposed to dart into a nearby building. Now I have read the guidelines issued by the Home Front Command: “When the alert siren or an explosion are heard, it is necessary to complete the process of protection, depending on the time available to you and to act according to the following instructions… If outside – enter the closest building, depending on the time available. If there is no building or cover/shelter nearby, or if you are in an open space, lie down on the ground and protect your head with your hands.” Oops! I have also, much to the JCB staff’s delight, secured a key to the bomb shelter.
Truth be told the threat of injury or harm from a rocket here in Jerusalem is minimal....
This post continues on The Times of Israel Ops & Blogs.
I have since learned that I handled my first missile attack incorrectly. It takes a Hamas rocket approximately 90 seconds to reach the Jerusalem area and so as confident I might have been about my quickened pace I was actually supposed to dart into a nearby building. Now I have read the guidelines issued by the Home Front Command: “When the alert siren or an explosion are heard, it is necessary to complete the process of protection, depending on the time available to you and to act according to the following instructions… If outside – enter the closest building, depending on the time available. If there is no building or cover/shelter nearby, or if you are in an open space, lie down on the ground and protect your head with your hands.” Oops! I have also, much to the JCB staff’s delight, secured a key to the bomb shelter.
Truth be told the threat of injury or harm from a rocket here in Jerusalem is minimal....
Balak, Zionism, Visions and Fantasies
My teacher Rabbi David Hartman once wrote: “Israel represents the birth of a healthy society that seeks to create a nation like all other nations. The demythologization of the Jewish people is one of the great gifts of Israeli society to the Jewish people.”
And yet at times this demythologization is almost too painful to behold.
Yesterday Jews protested the murder of three Israeli teenagers, shouting “Death to the Arabs.” It is also suspected that as revenge for the deaths of Gilad Shaar, Naftali Frenkel and Eyal Yifrach an East Jerusalem Arab teen, Muhammad Hussein Abu Khdeir, was murdered. Naftali Frenkel’s uncle responded: “There is no difference between blood and blood. A murderer is a murderer, no matter his nationality and age. There is no justification, no forgiveness and no atonement for any murder.”
Being in Jerusalem during these days I have the keen sense that our nation’s character is being tested. There are moments of great pride and solidarity.
At the funeral for these three teens, President Shimon Peres said, “We prayed, each of us alone and all of us together, for a miracle. We prayed that that we will see them return in peace to their families, to their homes and to us all. Sadly we were hit by the tragedy of their murder and a deep grief enveloped our people. We are an ancient people, united and deeply rooted. Our story is full of tears but the soul maintains the Torah. These three boys exposed the depth of our people and the heights it can reach.”
And yet there are other moments of embarrassment and shame. Rabbi Noam Perel, the leader of the Bnei Akiva youth movement, said, “The government of Israel is gathering for a revenge meeting that isn't a grief meeting. The landlord has gone mad at the sight of his sons' bodies. A government that turns the army of searchers to an army of avengers, an army that will not stop at 300 Philistine foreskins…” The myth and even fantasy of an ideal people is shattered. Who continues to idealize our people and cling to the notion that all Jews are animated by the Torah’s decree that every human being is created in the image of God?
Part of the Zionist project is the desire to be a nation like all other nations. And yet with the achievement of sovereignty comes the painful reminder that each and every day our Jewish character is tested. In the diaspora we wish Israel only to live up to our fantasies, to our images that it unique among the family of nations and always lives up to its founding principles. Israel may very well be unique but it is not always perfect. I wonder, is Judaism up to the challenge of sovereignty?
My teacher’s words ring in my ears during these painful days. A nation of our own means that our values will always be tested and that we will sometimes fall short. That is why David Hartman founded the center here in Jerusalem. In his mind the State of Israel was the greatest of experiments. Can our values be held up to the exposure of sovereignty? Singing Shalom Rav and clinging to the Jewish value of shalom when it was only a messianic dream, when we lacked political power and our lives were entirely in the hands of others was not a great challenge by comparison.
Holding on to life and preserving Jewish lives without negating the lives of others and without even denouncing the humanity of our enemies, is the supreme test that is the State of Israel’s lot. Each and every day this is challenged.
We wish to be a great nation, an example for Jews throughout the world, and even a light to other nations of the world. This is part of the dream of continuing to build up the State of Israel. This place is not only for us, but an example for all. Such is the dream of the nation we call our home as well. Great nations wish not only to serve their citizens but the world.
This is the vision of the Declaration of Independence that we celebrate on July 4th. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
We will continue to be tested. I continue to hope and pray that one day all the world will say along with the prophet Balaam,
“How wonderful are your tents, O Jacob,
Your dwellings, O Israel!
Like palm-groves that stretch out,
Like gardens beside a river,
Like aloes planted by the Lord
Like cedars beside the water…” (Numbers 24:5)
Sitting here in Jerusalem one has the feeling that we may very well hold that judgment in our hands—during these days.
And yet at times this demythologization is almost too painful to behold.
Yesterday Jews protested the murder of three Israeli teenagers, shouting “Death to the Arabs.” It is also suspected that as revenge for the deaths of Gilad Shaar, Naftali Frenkel and Eyal Yifrach an East Jerusalem Arab teen, Muhammad Hussein Abu Khdeir, was murdered. Naftali Frenkel’s uncle responded: “There is no difference between blood and blood. A murderer is a murderer, no matter his nationality and age. There is no justification, no forgiveness and no atonement for any murder.”
Being in Jerusalem during these days I have the keen sense that our nation’s character is being tested. There are moments of great pride and solidarity.
At the funeral for these three teens, President Shimon Peres said, “We prayed, each of us alone and all of us together, for a miracle. We prayed that that we will see them return in peace to their families, to their homes and to us all. Sadly we were hit by the tragedy of their murder and a deep grief enveloped our people. We are an ancient people, united and deeply rooted. Our story is full of tears but the soul maintains the Torah. These three boys exposed the depth of our people and the heights it can reach.”
And yet there are other moments of embarrassment and shame. Rabbi Noam Perel, the leader of the Bnei Akiva youth movement, said, “The government of Israel is gathering for a revenge meeting that isn't a grief meeting. The landlord has gone mad at the sight of his sons' bodies. A government that turns the army of searchers to an army of avengers, an army that will not stop at 300 Philistine foreskins…” The myth and even fantasy of an ideal people is shattered. Who continues to idealize our people and cling to the notion that all Jews are animated by the Torah’s decree that every human being is created in the image of God?
Part of the Zionist project is the desire to be a nation like all other nations. And yet with the achievement of sovereignty comes the painful reminder that each and every day our Jewish character is tested. In the diaspora we wish Israel only to live up to our fantasies, to our images that it unique among the family of nations and always lives up to its founding principles. Israel may very well be unique but it is not always perfect. I wonder, is Judaism up to the challenge of sovereignty?
My teacher’s words ring in my ears during these painful days. A nation of our own means that our values will always be tested and that we will sometimes fall short. That is why David Hartman founded the center here in Jerusalem. In his mind the State of Israel was the greatest of experiments. Can our values be held up to the exposure of sovereignty? Singing Shalom Rav and clinging to the Jewish value of shalom when it was only a messianic dream, when we lacked political power and our lives were entirely in the hands of others was not a great challenge by comparison.
Holding on to life and preserving Jewish lives without negating the lives of others and without even denouncing the humanity of our enemies, is the supreme test that is the State of Israel’s lot. Each and every day this is challenged.
We wish to be a great nation, an example for Jews throughout the world, and even a light to other nations of the world. This is part of the dream of continuing to build up the State of Israel. This place is not only for us, but an example for all. Such is the dream of the nation we call our home as well. Great nations wish not only to serve their citizens but the world.
This is the vision of the Declaration of Independence that we celebrate on July 4th. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
We will continue to be tested. I continue to hope and pray that one day all the world will say along with the prophet Balaam,
“How wonderful are your tents, O Jacob,
Your dwellings, O Israel!
Like palm-groves that stretch out,
Like gardens beside a river,
Like aloes planted by the Lord
Like cedars beside the water…” (Numbers 24:5)
Sitting here in Jerusalem one has the feeling that we may very well hold that judgment in our hands—during these days.
Three Boys
There are certain moments that unite us as a Jewish people. They should as well unite all human beings but sadly even the murder of these three young boys fails to stir the hardened hearts about us.
Yesterday we learned that these three boys, kidnapped eighteen days ago, were murdered soon after they were captured. Their bodies were discovered yesterday in hastily dug graves outside of Hebron. It was announced at 8:30 in the evening here in Israel.
My friends and I were in the midst of a lecture when our phones began flashing news alerts. Still our learning continued and then at its conclusion the sad news was announced to the assembled group. We stood together and as one. A colleague recited El Malei Rachamim and offered prayers for these three young souls. We sang Hatikvah. We stood quietly and then offered each other hugs as well as the occasional tears.
I am thankful to once again be in Jerusalem to renew my learning. I walk the city’s streets in the cool desert evenings and breath in the air of this remarkable and beloved city. But today the air is thick with grief and mourning. There is worry about what tomorrow will bring.
We recall the memories of Gilad Shaar, Naftali Frenkel and Eyal Yifrach. I pray that their families and friends discover some measure of consolation. May our nation one day find peace.
For now our hearts are joined in sorrow and our people united in grief.
Yesterday we learned that these three boys, kidnapped eighteen days ago, were murdered soon after they were captured. Their bodies were discovered yesterday in hastily dug graves outside of Hebron. It was announced at 8:30 in the evening here in Israel.
My friends and I were in the midst of a lecture when our phones began flashing news alerts. Still our learning continued and then at its conclusion the sad news was announced to the assembled group. We stood together and as one. A colleague recited El Malei Rachamim and offered prayers for these three young souls. We sang Hatikvah. We stood quietly and then offered each other hugs as well as the occasional tears.
I am thankful to once again be in Jerusalem to renew my learning. I walk the city’s streets in the cool desert evenings and breath in the air of this remarkable and beloved city. But today the air is thick with grief and mourning. There is worry about what tomorrow will bring.
We recall the memories of Gilad Shaar, Naftali Frenkel and Eyal Yifrach. I pray that their families and friends discover some measure of consolation. May our nation one day find peace.
For now our hearts are joined in sorrow and our people united in grief.
Hukkat, Soccer, You and We
The hero of the Torah, Moses, is not allowed to enter the Promised Land. The reason for this is because of what happens in this week’s portion.
The people were once again complaining. This time they were screaming for water. Moses is instructed to order a rock to provide water. Instead Moses hits the rock in anger and shouts at the people, “Listen you rebels!” (Numbers 20) Because Moses did not follow God’s instructions, hitting the rock and screaming at the people he was punished and told that he would only see the dream from afar, that he would not be allowed to lead the people into the land of Israel.
It seems a rather harsh punishment for a man who devoted so many years to leading a rather difficult people through even more difficult circumstances. Then again we can discern a lesson from this: one moment of anger can undo a lifetime of work. On the other hand Moses’ sin might not so much have been about his anger but as some commentators suggest the fact that he separated himself from the community he led. He screamed “you” instead of shouting “we.”
Anger is not always inappropriate. There are many injustices that are deserving of our indignation. Sometimes we can only right wrongs when we sing as one and say, “We shall…” Perhaps Moses was right to get angry but wrong to see himself apart from the community. So much more can be accomplished, and overcome, and even righted when we are joined together as one.
Like many I have been reveling in soccer these past days. (Go USA!) Futbol is a wonderful sport to watch at the World Cup level. Most games are low scoring by our American standards. For a goal to be scored most of a team’s players are usually involved moving the ball up the field (nay, pitch) and then into the net. It is a beautiful thing to see a team of eleven working in concert with another. That is soccer at its best.
This is the reason why the referee can issue a red card if a player hits his own teammate. Such an act happened in a recent Cameroon game. The referee did not see it so there was no penalty, but the sportscasters noted it and replayed it for all to witness. For all of FIFA’s scandals (may the 2022 games be moved from Qatar to the US!) it makes a remarkable statement about the value of teamwork by delineating a penalty for acting so egregiously against one’s own team.
Very little can be accomplished when there is dissension and disunity. Much can be achieved when we restrain our own egos (even the greatest and most skilled soccer players sometimes only pass the ball to the goal scorer; take that LeBron!) and say together, “we.” Leadership must always be about saying what we can do, rather than here is what you must do.
It seems to me that the tone of so many of today’s leaders is more about what the other guy is doing wrong rather than what we can, and must, accomplish together. Too often I hear Moses’ words in the mouths of our leaders, “Listen you rebels…listen you rebels…” We need more to say, “we” and far less to say, “you.”
In the moment that Moses said “you” and not “we” he actually became the rebel and was denied his lifelong dream.
The people were once again complaining. This time they were screaming for water. Moses is instructed to order a rock to provide water. Instead Moses hits the rock in anger and shouts at the people, “Listen you rebels!” (Numbers 20) Because Moses did not follow God’s instructions, hitting the rock and screaming at the people he was punished and told that he would only see the dream from afar, that he would not be allowed to lead the people into the land of Israel.
It seems a rather harsh punishment for a man who devoted so many years to leading a rather difficult people through even more difficult circumstances. Then again we can discern a lesson from this: one moment of anger can undo a lifetime of work. On the other hand Moses’ sin might not so much have been about his anger but as some commentators suggest the fact that he separated himself from the community he led. He screamed “you” instead of shouting “we.”
Anger is not always inappropriate. There are many injustices that are deserving of our indignation. Sometimes we can only right wrongs when we sing as one and say, “We shall…” Perhaps Moses was right to get angry but wrong to see himself apart from the community. So much more can be accomplished, and overcome, and even righted when we are joined together as one.
Like many I have been reveling in soccer these past days. (Go USA!) Futbol is a wonderful sport to watch at the World Cup level. Most games are low scoring by our American standards. For a goal to be scored most of a team’s players are usually involved moving the ball up the field (nay, pitch) and then into the net. It is a beautiful thing to see a team of eleven working in concert with another. That is soccer at its best.
This is the reason why the referee can issue a red card if a player hits his own teammate. Such an act happened in a recent Cameroon game. The referee did not see it so there was no penalty, but the sportscasters noted it and replayed it for all to witness. For all of FIFA’s scandals (may the 2022 games be moved from Qatar to the US!) it makes a remarkable statement about the value of teamwork by delineating a penalty for acting so egregiously against one’s own team.
Very little can be accomplished when there is dissension and disunity. Much can be achieved when we restrain our own egos (even the greatest and most skilled soccer players sometimes only pass the ball to the goal scorer; take that LeBron!) and say together, “we.” Leadership must always be about saying what we can do, rather than here is what you must do.
It seems to me that the tone of so many of today’s leaders is more about what the other guy is doing wrong rather than what we can, and must, accomplish together. Too often I hear Moses’ words in the mouths of our leaders, “Listen you rebels…listen you rebels…” We need more to say, “we” and far less to say, “you.”
In the moment that Moses said “you” and not “we” he actually became the rebel and was denied his lifelong dream.
Korah, Revolutions and Altalena Moments
On June 20, 1948 a ship, the Altalena, carrying arms and
fighters bound for the fledgling army of the newly founded State of Israel,
reached the shore off the coast of Tel Aviv.
There was only one problem. The
arms shipment was arranged by the more radical Irgun led by Menachem Begin and
not by David ben Gurion and the Israel Defense Forces. Begin and ben Gurion had only recently made
an agreement to bring the Irgun under the leadership of the IDF. In addition a truce had recently been
brokered between Israel and the Arab armies.
Ben Gurion was adamant that the Altalena and its cargo of
weapons and fighters surrender to the IDF.
There could be only one leader and one army during this trying moment in
Israel’s history. Begin refused to
compromise. He insisted that at the very
least the arms be guaranteed to the Irgun fighters in their new IDF units. Ben Gurion believed that such compromises
would only create an army within an army.
The IDF concentrated forces on the beach and fired on the
Altalena. One shell hit the ship and
caught fire. Fearing that the ship would
explode many jumped into the Mediterranean Sea.
IDF machine gunners continued their fire. Sixteen Irgun fighters were killed. Three IDF soldiers were also killed in the
confrontation. The details of this
incident continue to be debated; the decisions remain controversial. Its memories as well continue to haunt many who struggled
to establish the state during its early years.
Yitzhak Rabin was the commander of the IDF forces assembled at the beach.
I remember meeting an Irgun fighter a year after Rabin’s
assassination. He said in response to my
pain about the assassination and what I termed a great tragedy for the State of
Israel and the Jewish people, “I will not shed a tear for the man who was
responsible for killing my brothers.”
This week we read about Korah’s rebellion against Moses’
leadership. On the surface Korah’s
criticisms appear legitimate. In
essence, he argues that Moses concentrates all the power in his own hands. God’s judgment is harsh, and even
ruthless. Korah and all his followers,
as well as their households, are killed.
“Scarcely had Moses finished speaking all these words when the ground
under them burst asunder, and the earth opened its mouth and swallowed them up with
their households, all Korah’s people and all their possessions.” (Numbers
16:32-33)
Every revolution has such moments of clarity, and yes even
of ruthless violence, against one’s own people.
A nation can only be built, a people created if there is a clarity of
vision. Sometimes, history teaches us, such
ideals can only be upheld by defending them with arms. Leaders always believe
that their decisions are decisive, that they can bend the arc of history, that
they, and they alone, are leading their people through such a revolutionary
moment and that all who oppose them are rebels.
Who is labeled a rebel and who called a great leader is left to the
judgment of history. It is only looking
back through the lens of history that we gain these insights. In the throes of these moments there is only
pain.
Three Israel teenagers were kidnapped a week ago: Naftali
Frankel, Gilad Shaar, and Eyal Yifrach.
Despite extensive searches throughout the West Bank and in particular
Hebron they have yet to be found. The
Jewish people are united in prayer. May
they soon be returned home to their families in peace and in full health! And yet I wonder if the Palestinians and
their leadership have reached a moment of decisiveness. The Palestinian Authority Prime Minister, Mahmoud
Abbas, directed his ire at the kidnappers and said, “These three boys are human
beings like us, and they should be returned to their families.”
And while I recognize and am deeply pained by the
celebrations of the kidnapping in the Palestinian street and as well by the
unity government formed between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas, I offer this
tentative hope that this moment can become one of decisive leadership when
those who wish only for the destruction of Israel rather than the creation of a
Palestinian State are excised from the Palestinian polity, when a clear vision
of something beautiful and lasting is offered to the Palestinians and to this
conflict filled region. That would be
such an occasion to offer sweets to one another.
Revolutions require such decisive moments.
I continue to hope and pray that one day I will look back on these days, through the blessing of history, and see today’s moment as the time when the vision of two states for two peoples was clarified and reborn.
For more details on the Altalena Affair visit the Jewish Virtual Library.
I continue to hope and pray that one day I will look back on these days, through the blessing of history, and see today’s moment as the time when the vision of two states for two peoples was clarified and reborn.
For more details on the Altalena Affair visit the Jewish Virtual Library.
Shelach Lecha, Wild Things and Faith
“And the wild things roared their terrible roars and gnashed
their terrible teeth and rolled their terrible eyes and showed their terrible
claws.” (Maurice Sendak, Where the
Wild Things Are)
And ten of the spies sent by Moses to scout the land report:
“The land that we traversed and scouted is one that devours its settlers. All the people that we saw in it are men of
great size; we saw the giants and the children of giants, and we looked like
grasshoppers to ourselves, and so we must have looked to them.” (Numbers
13:32-33)
Max, the hero of Sendak’s book, overcomes his fears, and in
particular his anger, by imagining that he is their ruler, that he is their
master. Imagination is a powerful
tool. Within it we discover the secret
of our success. Within it are the sparks
of creativity. This is exactly the
wisdom of Judaism’s insights about the yetzer hara, often translated as the
evil inclination. Within this we
discover, for example, desire and drive.
These traits can lead us toward passion, commitment and love, or lust.
They can move us toward invention and achievement on the one hand, or jealousy
and vengeance on the other. The
creative spirit hovers between these extremes.
We learn as well that imagination can conspire against us,
creating fear in our hearts. That is
part of the lesson of Maurice Sendak’s brilliant book. The line between fear and hope is thin. It is also the lesson of this week’s
portion. It is hard to believe that there
were in fact giants who ruled the land of Israel. The evidence of this truth are the Torah’s words:
we looked like grasshoppers to ourselves.
Faith is about how we perceive ourselves. Ten of the spies lacked faith in their assigned
task and in their ability to achieve their destined goal. This is why the people are condemned to
wander for forty years before returning to this crossroad once again.
Only Joshua and Caleb believed that the people would
succeed. They scouted the same land and
saw the same sights and yet they returned with a message of hope. Curiously the details of their report are not
found in the Torah. We only read: “Caleb
hushed the people before Moses and said, ‘Let us by all means go up, and we
shall gain possession of it, for we shall surely overcome it.’” (Numbers 13:
30) Perhaps they, like Max, mastered
their emotions, summoned their faith and overcame their fears. Perhaps the men of the land were indeed
giants, but Joshua and Caleb nonetheless did not see themselves as
grasshoppers.
Although Hebrew offers the term emunah for faith, the
tradition more often uses yirah and in particular yirat hashamayim. This phrase can be translated as fear of
heaven or as I prefer, awe. Yet the lesson
remains. Fear and awe are near to one another. Faith is a matter of how we regard heaven, of
what we believe our relationship is to God, of how we imagine ourselves in
regard to the Almighty.
It is true God is a giant by comparison. And yet this does not mean we must see
ourselves as puny grasshoppers.
Fear, and faith, are a matter of how we see ourselves.
Shavuot and All Night Study
This evening begins the holiday of Shavuot. Although it celebrates the giving of the
Torah on Mount Sinai, it is not widely observed. Why?
Unlike Passover with its Seder and four cups of wine and Sukkot with its
booths and four species (the lulav and etrog), Shavuot offers little more than
an all-night Torah study session. That
is to be honest a difficult sell.
And yet what could be more defining than the study of
Torah? More than anything else Talmud
Torah, the study of Torah, is what makes us a Jewish people. This act has allowed us to breathe new life
into an ancient text for generations. It
is not an easy task of course. Study is
challenging. The meaning discovered in
these words can sometimes be elusive.
But we continue to pour over the words of Torah.
Year after year we read the same portions. Generation after generation we uncover new,
and different, meaning in the Torah’s words.
This is what Shavuot celebrates.
The freedom we mark on Passover discovers its true
importance when wedded to the gift of Torah.
This is why the date of Shavuot is given in a different manner than all
other holidays. We count from the second
night of Passover seven weeks (shavuot) until arriving at the holiday of
Shavuot. The holiday’s name intimates
this important connection. Even the
wandering we celebrate on Sukkot is given fuller meaning by the celebration of
the fact that as we wander we continue to carry the Torah in our arms.
What we most prize is a book.
It is not just the act of carrying this book, even though
throughout our history, and in too many instances, we did so under duress and
even threat of persecution. It is not
simply holding this book close to our hearts and carrying it from one place to
another, or even lifting this scroll into the arms of our children, but instead
pouring over its words and wresting meaning from its pages. True, study can be difficult and challenging,
and sometimes because of the Hebrew and the verses’ ancient constructs, appear
off-putting and uninviting. And yet Talmud
Torah remains defining. The study of
Torah leads us to everything we must do, to everything we are required to do,
to all that we envision for our most noble selves.
The Talmud teaches: These
are the things that are limitless of which a person enjoys the fruit of the
world, while the principal remains in the world to come. They are: honoring one’s father and mother,
engaging in deeds of compassion, arriving early for study, morning and evening,
dealing graciously with guests, visiting the sick, providing for the wedding
couple, accompanying the dead for burial, being devoted in prayer, and making
peace among people. But the study of
Torah encompasses them all. (Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat 127a)
For the Jewish
people it begins and ends with the study of Torah.
Naso, Buildings and Dreaming Big
There is a Jewish tradition that God never finished the creation of the world, leaving it purposefully incomplete. God allowed for human beings to continue the creation process, to use their hands, and their efforts, to complete the work of creation.
The Midrash teaches: “A philosopher asks Rabbi Hoshaya, ‘If circumcision is so precious, why was Adam not born circumcised?’ Rabbi Hoshaya responds, ‘Whatever was created in the first six days of creation requires further preparation, e.g. mustard needs sweetening…wheat needs grinding, and so too man needs to be finished.’” (Genesis Rabbah 11:6) We are partners in creation.
We read in this week’s portion that the Israelites completed the building of the Tabernacle. “On the day that Moses finished setting up the Tabernacle, he anointed and consecrated it and all its furnishings, as well as the altar and its utensils.” (Numbers 7) As in the creation story, the Hebrew suggests that the work continues, that it remains, like the world at large, a work in progress. We still continue to finish the Tabernacle, the mishkan.
For the ancient Israelites this truth was apparent. They understood that despite Moses’ dedication ceremony, the Tabernacle was temporary and impermanent. The mishkan was the portable Tabernacle that they carried with them throughout their wanderings in the wilderness. The Israelites would pack up the mishkan and its furnishings and move from one destination to the next. For our ancestors the Tabernacle was the symbol of God’s presence in their midst. It gave them the confidence that God accompanied them throughout their journeys.
They continued to move, stage by stage. And they continued to finish the building, and perfect creation, while believing that God remained in their midst. One of the many lessons of the Torah is that the journey is what is defining not the destination. Otherwise the Torah would not have five books, but six and conclude with the Book of Joshua in which we conquer the land of Israel and establish there our homeland. Instead the Torah concludes in what is today modern day Jordan, looking at the dream off in the distance. And then we return to reading the creation story.
The purpose is the journey. The sanctuaries and buildings we build are but tools.
Too often these buildings and their furnishings become identified with the synagogue rather than the people they serve. This week we learn that community is never completed. We are reminded that we are forever wandering.
While I recognize that the journey can sometimes be frustrating, (“Rabbi, when are we going to have a building of our own?”) we too continue to journey and are forever completing. And while a building is now within reach, and even closer at hand, there is a certain power to holding dreams off in the distance. There is a strength and resolve that is gained, imagination and vision that is clarified, when we continue to reach for something.
Part of what the Torah teaches is that there is a spirit of the wilderness, of wandering that sustains the Jewish people. It is a feeling that we are creating something new and different. It is a passion that this journey has meaning and that the dream, however distant it might sometimes appear, is worth the challenges of the midbar, the wilderness. It is these aspirations that continue to give life to our people. And it is this same spirit that has sustained our congregation for nearly twenty years.
Some people look at our congregation and say, “When are you guys ever going to have a building?” But that is not what I see. I look at our congregation and say, “We are better without a building than most synagogues are with a building.” I believe it is because we continue to reach for dreams, that we, more than most of our contemporaries, have imbibed this spirit of wandering that is our biblical legacy.
Soon we will have a building. “Halleluyah! Praise God in God’s sanctuary.” (Psalm 150) We must then recall that this moment is not the realization of a dream, but the beginning of another journey and a new task of completing the work. We must then strive even harder to hold fast to our aspirations, to cling to this spirit of wandering. The building will not sustain us. Such sustenance can only come from our hearts.
The process continues of perfecting our world, of bettering our community, of striving to bring God’s presence to our world. The building will most certainly aid us in these goals, but it is not the dream. Those must be held off in the distance.
The wandering continues. Even the building continues. The world requires more work.
The Midrash teaches: “A philosopher asks Rabbi Hoshaya, ‘If circumcision is so precious, why was Adam not born circumcised?’ Rabbi Hoshaya responds, ‘Whatever was created in the first six days of creation requires further preparation, e.g. mustard needs sweetening…wheat needs grinding, and so too man needs to be finished.’” (Genesis Rabbah 11:6) We are partners in creation.
We read in this week’s portion that the Israelites completed the building of the Tabernacle. “On the day that Moses finished setting up the Tabernacle, he anointed and consecrated it and all its furnishings, as well as the altar and its utensils.” (Numbers 7) As in the creation story, the Hebrew suggests that the work continues, that it remains, like the world at large, a work in progress. We still continue to finish the Tabernacle, the mishkan.
For the ancient Israelites this truth was apparent. They understood that despite Moses’ dedication ceremony, the Tabernacle was temporary and impermanent. The mishkan was the portable Tabernacle that they carried with them throughout their wanderings in the wilderness. The Israelites would pack up the mishkan and its furnishings and move from one destination to the next. For our ancestors the Tabernacle was the symbol of God’s presence in their midst. It gave them the confidence that God accompanied them throughout their journeys.
They continued to move, stage by stage. And they continued to finish the building, and perfect creation, while believing that God remained in their midst. One of the many lessons of the Torah is that the journey is what is defining not the destination. Otherwise the Torah would not have five books, but six and conclude with the Book of Joshua in which we conquer the land of Israel and establish there our homeland. Instead the Torah concludes in what is today modern day Jordan, looking at the dream off in the distance. And then we return to reading the creation story.
The purpose is the journey. The sanctuaries and buildings we build are but tools.
Too often these buildings and their furnishings become identified with the synagogue rather than the people they serve. This week we learn that community is never completed. We are reminded that we are forever wandering.
While I recognize that the journey can sometimes be frustrating, (“Rabbi, when are we going to have a building of our own?”) we too continue to journey and are forever completing. And while a building is now within reach, and even closer at hand, there is a certain power to holding dreams off in the distance. There is a strength and resolve that is gained, imagination and vision that is clarified, when we continue to reach for something.
Part of what the Torah teaches is that there is a spirit of the wilderness, of wandering that sustains the Jewish people. It is a feeling that we are creating something new and different. It is a passion that this journey has meaning and that the dream, however distant it might sometimes appear, is worth the challenges of the midbar, the wilderness. It is these aspirations that continue to give life to our people. And it is this same spirit that has sustained our congregation for nearly twenty years.
Some people look at our congregation and say, “When are you guys ever going to have a building?” But that is not what I see. I look at our congregation and say, “We are better without a building than most synagogues are with a building.” I believe it is because we continue to reach for dreams, that we, more than most of our contemporaries, have imbibed this spirit of wandering that is our biblical legacy.
Soon we will have a building. “Halleluyah! Praise God in God’s sanctuary.” (Psalm 150) We must then recall that this moment is not the realization of a dream, but the beginning of another journey and a new task of completing the work. We must then strive even harder to hold fast to our aspirations, to cling to this spirit of wandering. The building will not sustain us. Such sustenance can only come from our hearts.
The process continues of perfecting our world, of bettering our community, of striving to bring God’s presence to our world. The building will most certainly aid us in these goals, but it is not the dream. Those must be held off in the distance.
The wandering continues. Even the building continues. The world requires more work.
Bamidbar, Wandering and the Book
What is the most important book of the Torah? Is it Genesis in which the world was created and Abraham first communes with God? Is it instead Exodus when God liberates the Jewish people from Egypt and reveals the Torah on Mount Sinai? Perhaps one could argue it is Leviticus in which a myriad of ritual laws are revealed, for example the basis for Jewish prayers, as well as the all important ethical commandments, in particular “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” Then again one could argue it is the concluding book of the Torah, Deuteronomy, in which the most of the commandments are elucidated and we near the realization of entering the Promised Land.
One can of course make a compelling argument for each of these books. I would like instead to entertain the idea that it is the fourth book of the Torah, Numbers, which we begin reading on this Shabbat. In this book, called in Hebrew Bamidbar—in the wilderness—we become a people. In this book we become destined to forever wander, we continue journeying from Sinai to that distant, far off promise. The book is filled with disappointments, rebellions and complaining. More than any other book Numbers speaks in a realistic tone, offering appraisals of what journeys are often made.
It is a remarkable statement about our Jewish faith that our central text contains such a book. Here is but a taste of what we are to read here: “And then the Israelites wept and said, ‘If only we had meat to eat! We remember the fish that we used to eat free in Egypt…’” (Numbers 11) The people complain and complain. “Daddy, when are we going to get there?” Our leader Moses loses his patience as well. He screams, “Listen, you rebels, shall we get water for you from this rock?” (Numbers 20) God becomes incensed with the people. Relationships are tested. There are moments when the journey appears to be nearing its demise.
And yet we continue to wander. The wilderness, the midbar, the desert is where we become a people. There, in wandering and challenge we are defined.
Edmond Jabes, the 20th century French Jewish author who fled his native Egypt during the 1956 Suez Crisis, writes: “With exemplary regularity the Jew chooses to set out for the desert, to go toward a renewed word that has become his origin…. A wandering word is the word of God. It has for echo the word of a wandering people. No oasis for it, no shadow, no peace. Only the immense, thirsty desert, on the book of this thirst, the devastating fire of this fire reducing all books to ashes at the threshold of the obsessive, illegible Book bequeathed to us.”
Wandering is the first, most important book that we write. Struggle and challenge is what makes us whole. It is what makes us one.
We turn again to the pages of the wilderness, of the verses of Bamidbar.
One can of course make a compelling argument for each of these books. I would like instead to entertain the idea that it is the fourth book of the Torah, Numbers, which we begin reading on this Shabbat. In this book, called in Hebrew Bamidbar—in the wilderness—we become a people. In this book we become destined to forever wander, we continue journeying from Sinai to that distant, far off promise. The book is filled with disappointments, rebellions and complaining. More than any other book Numbers speaks in a realistic tone, offering appraisals of what journeys are often made.
It is a remarkable statement about our Jewish faith that our central text contains such a book. Here is but a taste of what we are to read here: “And then the Israelites wept and said, ‘If only we had meat to eat! We remember the fish that we used to eat free in Egypt…’” (Numbers 11) The people complain and complain. “Daddy, when are we going to get there?” Our leader Moses loses his patience as well. He screams, “Listen, you rebels, shall we get water for you from this rock?” (Numbers 20) God becomes incensed with the people. Relationships are tested. There are moments when the journey appears to be nearing its demise.
And yet we continue to wander. The wilderness, the midbar, the desert is where we become a people. There, in wandering and challenge we are defined.
Edmond Jabes, the 20th century French Jewish author who fled his native Egypt during the 1956 Suez Crisis, writes: “With exemplary regularity the Jew chooses to set out for the desert, to go toward a renewed word that has become his origin…. A wandering word is the word of God. It has for echo the word of a wandering people. No oasis for it, no shadow, no peace. Only the immense, thirsty desert, on the book of this thirst, the devastating fire of this fire reducing all books to ashes at the threshold of the obsessive, illegible Book bequeathed to us.”
Wandering is the first, most important book that we write. Struggle and challenge is what makes us whole. It is what makes us one.
We turn again to the pages of the wilderness, of the verses of Bamidbar.
Behukkotai and Walking Tall
Why is it that religiosity is defined as sitting in services and reciting the prayers authored millennia ago?
The Torah suggests a different ideal. “If you walk after My laws, and keep My commandments and do them, I will grant your rains in their season, so that the earth shall yield its produce and the trees of the field their fruit….” (Leviticus 26:3-4)
The ideal is not then the recitation of prayers but walking. Our forefathers Abraham and Isaac are in fact praised not for their prayers but for walking with God: “The God in whose ways my fathers Abraham and Isaac walked…” (Genesis 48:15)
Judaism is a religion of action, of movement. We follow a path. In fact the Hebrew word for Jewish law, halachah, comes from the word to walk. We are to walk; we are to do. Sitting and talking, even praying and singing, are not the ideals, but rather participating, engaging and moving. We are identified by our doing; we are judged by walking the path. Proper intent and feelings are secondary. Doing is primary.
The prayer that is the hallmark of the bar or bat mitzvah, an aliya, is named as well by its movement. We ascend to the bima. And then after reciting these blessings for Torah what words are offered to the participant? Yashar koach. May you continue to have the strength to stand upright. There is a path to follow. Walking defines.
One more example. At the conclusion of shiva one is supposed to leave the house and go for a walk. We are counseled to take these first, tentative steps. We don’t wait until the feelings motivate us to re-enter the world at large. First we walk. First we step outside. Eventually feelings might follow. Our souls are restored. The Jewish contention, found in this week’s portion, is that we find healing by taking these first hesitant steps.
Recently I went for a walk. I looked up through the cold but gentle drizzle at a limb torn from a tree by a winter storm. I realized that the tree continues to reach for the heavens. Its leaves now begin to open up to the spring air. The edges of green unfurl. I wondered, will it be bruised again by another storm? And yet the tree appears to grow more sturdy. Its trunk widens each and every year.
The broken branch remains forever.
And I continue on my walk.
The Torah suggests a different ideal. “If you walk after My laws, and keep My commandments and do them, I will grant your rains in their season, so that the earth shall yield its produce and the trees of the field their fruit….” (Leviticus 26:3-4)
The ideal is not then the recitation of prayers but walking. Our forefathers Abraham and Isaac are in fact praised not for their prayers but for walking with God: “The God in whose ways my fathers Abraham and Isaac walked…” (Genesis 48:15)
Judaism is a religion of action, of movement. We follow a path. In fact the Hebrew word for Jewish law, halachah, comes from the word to walk. We are to walk; we are to do. Sitting and talking, even praying and singing, are not the ideals, but rather participating, engaging and moving. We are identified by our doing; we are judged by walking the path. Proper intent and feelings are secondary. Doing is primary.
The prayer that is the hallmark of the bar or bat mitzvah, an aliya, is named as well by its movement. We ascend to the bima. And then after reciting these blessings for Torah what words are offered to the participant? Yashar koach. May you continue to have the strength to stand upright. There is a path to follow. Walking defines.
One more example. At the conclusion of shiva one is supposed to leave the house and go for a walk. We are counseled to take these first, tentative steps. We don’t wait until the feelings motivate us to re-enter the world at large. First we walk. First we step outside. Eventually feelings might follow. Our souls are restored. The Jewish contention, found in this week’s portion, is that we find healing by taking these first hesitant steps.
Recently I went for a walk. I looked up through the cold but gentle drizzle at a limb torn from a tree by a winter storm. I realized that the tree continues to reach for the heavens. Its leaves now begin to open up to the spring air. The edges of green unfurl. I wondered, will it be bruised again by another storm? And yet the tree appears to grow more sturdy. Its trunk widens each and every year.
The broken branch remains forever.
And I continue on my walk.
Behar, Everest and Vistas
It is curious that the laws dealing with the land, namely the Sabbatical and Jubilee years, are introduced by the words. “The Lord spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai…” (Leviticus 25) Why does the Torah emphasize “on Mount Sinai”?
Why emphasize that these particular laws were given on Sinai? The commentaries offer different explanations. One suggests that because in the moment that the Torah was given, when the Jewish people stood as one, at Mount Sinai, no one owned any land. The laws that follow deal with a visionary system in which we are required to allow the land to rest on the seventh year and on the fiftieth year for all debts to be forgiven. Such demands necessitate ownership. The Torah therefore emphasizes that at one point we were without land and owned nothing.
Another commentator suggests: “Just as Sinai was the smallest of the mountains but the words spoken there changed the world, so the people Israel, among the smallest of the nations, presents a vision of social justice that has the power to change the world.” (Etz Hayim Torah and Commentary) The tradition makes much of the fact that Mount Sinai was an ordinary and perhaps even insignificant mountain. It was however transformed into holy ground by the most extraordinary of circumstances.
Still I wonder what is about mountains that so captures our imaginations? Why do so many for example attempt to scale Everest’s heights? Why do people wish to conquer taller and taller mountains? Such attempts too often end in tragedy. Any trail that leads through a “death zone” should offer hint enough that tragedy can strike and that the greater the heights the more extraordinary the risk. Recently thirteen Sherpas lost their lives. These remarkable individuals were aiding others so that they could in turn claim, “I summited Everest.” And yet I remain transfixed by this tragedy.
Once I spent a week hiking through the Sinai desert. We were led through that wilderness by Bedouin guides. Eventually we ascended what local Arab tradition deemed Jabal Mousa, the Mount of Moses. We were told that this was Mount Sinai. It was a rather nondescript mountain. Still the climb was thrilling. The summit however was anticlimactic. Atop the mountain we could purchase sodas from Egyptian vendors. They apparently made their way to the mountain’s top each and every morning in order to sell sodas to thirsty foreigners.
And then and there I realized that mountains might better left to the eye and the imagination. In fact Jewish tradition does not ascribe Jabal Musa as Mount Sinai. It refuses to name which mountain is in fact Sinai. One could say this is because we can no longer determine which mountain it in fact is. Then again sometimes not knowing is better than knowing. Mountains are better left to eye. And mountain tops are better left to the imagination. It is better to look up at their majesty and from that view to allow the imagination to foster inspiration.
I lift up my eyes to the mountains; from where will my help come? My help comes from the Lord, maker of heaven and earth….” (Psalm 121)
Another commentator suggests: “Just as Sinai was the smallest of the mountains but the words spoken there changed the world, so the people Israel, among the smallest of the nations, presents a vision of social justice that has the power to change the world.” (Etz Hayim Torah and Commentary) The tradition makes much of the fact that Mount Sinai was an ordinary and perhaps even insignificant mountain. It was however transformed into holy ground by the most extraordinary of circumstances.
Still I wonder what is about mountains that so captures our imaginations? Why do so many for example attempt to scale Everest’s heights? Why do people wish to conquer taller and taller mountains? Such attempts too often end in tragedy. Any trail that leads through a “death zone” should offer hint enough that tragedy can strike and that the greater the heights the more extraordinary the risk. Recently thirteen Sherpas lost their lives. These remarkable individuals were aiding others so that they could in turn claim, “I summited Everest.” And yet I remain transfixed by this tragedy.
Once I spent a week hiking through the Sinai desert. We were led through that wilderness by Bedouin guides. Eventually we ascended what local Arab tradition deemed Jabal Mousa, the Mount of Moses. We were told that this was Mount Sinai. It was a rather nondescript mountain. Still the climb was thrilling. The summit however was anticlimactic. Atop the mountain we could purchase sodas from Egyptian vendors. They apparently made their way to the mountain’s top each and every morning in order to sell sodas to thirsty foreigners.
And then and there I realized that mountains might better left to the eye and the imagination. In fact Jewish tradition does not ascribe Jabal Musa as Mount Sinai. It refuses to name which mountain is in fact Sinai. One could say this is because we can no longer determine which mountain it in fact is. Then again sometimes not knowing is better than knowing. Mountains are better left to eye. And mountain tops are better left to the imagination. It is better to look up at their majesty and from that view to allow the imagination to foster inspiration.
I lift up my eyes to the mountains; from where will my help come? My help comes from the Lord, maker of heaven and earth….” (Psalm 121)